🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.