🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

In Europe, a rising chorus of nations are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our children's youth". The policy could be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "an options in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to enact a proposal lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised families to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for minors without parental consent is provided. Although it warns of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a solid first step," stated a leading MEP driving the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "based on robust data".

Last year, interest built behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. However, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a teenager who died after viewing dangerous platform posts contends that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are safe and fit for minors," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the regional level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a measure prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws requiring adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various figures to mimic Australia's path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from these regions, further countries are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies take a more cautious position. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

As this international conversation continues, the steps of the Australian government and its followers demonstrate that policymakers around the world are less and less willing to wait for the industry to self-regulate.